General information
-
What is Free Pascal (FPC)?
Originally named FPK-Pascal, the Free Pascal compiler is a 16,32 and 64 bit Turbo Pascal and Delphi compatible Pascal compiler for Linux, Windows, OS/2, FreeBSD, Mac OS X, DOS and several other platforms (the number of supported targets grows all the time, although not all of them are on the same level as the main ones).
The Free Pascal compiler is available for several architectures: x86 (16,32 and 64 bit), ARM, PowerPC (32 and 64 bit), SPARC (v8, v9), Java Virtual Machine (under development) and MIPS (little and big endian, under development). An older version (the 1.0 series) and current development versions also supported m68k.
The compiler is written in Pascal and is able to compile its own sources. The source files are distributed under the GPLv2+ and included.
Short history:
- 06/1993: project start
- 10/1993: first small programs work
- 03/1995: the compiler compiles its own sources
- 03/1996: released on the Internet
- 07/2000: 1.0 released
- 12/2000: 1.0.4 released
- 04/2002: 1.0.6 released
- 07/2003: 1.0.10 released
- 05/2005: 2.0.0 released
- 12/2005: 2.0.2 released
- 08/2006: 2.0.4 released
- 09/2007: 2.2.0 released
- 08/2008: 2.2.2 released
- 04/2009: 2.2.4 released
- 12/2009: 2.4.0 released
- 11/2010: 2.4.2 released
- 05/2011: 2.4.4 released
- 01/2012: 2.6.0 released
- 02/2013: 2.6.2 released
- 03/2014: 2.6.4 released
- 01/2015: 3.0.0 released
- ??/2015: 3.0.2 released
-
Which versions exist, and which one should I use?
The latest official version is 3.0.2, the second release in the 3.0.x series. New development is performed in the 3.1.x series, which will eventually be released as 3.2.0 or 4.0.0, depending on milestones achieved.
Historic versions
FPC's version numbering changed a few times over the years. Pre-1.0 versioning information has been moved to the Wiki 1.0 versioning article.
Modern versioning
With the release of 1.0, the version numbering was slightly changed to a system resembling one used for the Linux kernels.
- Releases that only fix bugs in version 1.0 are numbered 1.0.x.
- Post-1.0 development (the so called snapshots) have version number 1.1.x.
- Eventually the 1.1.x versions, when stabilized, were released as the 2.0.x series, preceded by betas marked as 1.9.x. Fixes to the 2.0 release were numbered 2.0.x, fixes to the 2.2 release 2.2.x, fixes to the 2.4 release as 2.4.x etc
- The new development version after the 2.4.0 release was numbered 2.5.x and so on.
- Repackagings that affect sources are indicated with a single letter as suffix (e.g. 2.0.4a). This is usually the case for platforms that weren't part of the original release round.
- The stable branch (currently, fixes_3_0, previously fixes_2_6) always has an odd last number (2.6.1, 2.6.3 and 3.0.1). Compilers with such versions are snapshots, and e.g. a snapshot with 2.6.1 can be anywhere between 2.6.0 and the moment 2.6.2 branched off (Jan 2013). Likewise, after the release of 2.6.2 the fixes_2_6 branch identified itself as version 2.6.3 till 2.6.4 branched off (typically two months before its release). After 2.6.4, the stable branch's number was updated to 2.6.5, after 3.0.0 to 3.0.1 etc.
Normally, you would want to use a release. Releases are considered stable, and easier to support (the bugs, quirks and unintended "features" are well known after a period of time, and workarounds exist).
Development snapshots (which are generated daily) reflect the current status of the compiler. Development versions probably have new features and larger bugs fixed since the last release, but might have some temporary stability drawbacks (which are usually fixed by the next day).
Development snapshots are often quite useful for certain categories of users. Ask on the mailing lists if it is worth the trouble in your case if you are not sure.
Snapshots of the stable branch (fixes_3_0) are meant to test release engineering. They are mainly interesting in the months before a release to extensively test the branch from which the release is created.
We advise all users to upgrade to the newest version for their target (preferably the new stable 3.0.x series).
A graphical timeline of the FPC project plus its near future would be:
-
Free Pascal and GNU Pascal - a comparison
- Aim:
- Free Pascal tries to implement a Borland compatible pascal compiler on as many platforms as possible. GNU Pascal tries to implement a portable pascal compiler based on POSIX.
- Version:
- Currently, Free Pascal is at version 3.0.2 (july 2016). GNU Pascal is stopped version 2.1 (from 2002, which can be built with several different GCC's as backend; their Mac OS X version is an exception though, as it follows the GCC version number).
- Tracking:
- Between releases, development versions of FPC are available through daily snapshots and the source via SVN. GPC issues a set of patches to the last version a few times a year, and there are regular snapshot for OS X and Windows, made by users.
- Operating systems:
- Free Pascal runs on a large number of platforms, inlcuding DOS (16/32-bit), Win32 (no UNIX porting layer needed), Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OS/2, BeOS, Mac OS X, on the following architectures: x86 (32 and 64 bit), SPARC, PowerPC (32 and 64 bit), ARM, Java Virtual Machine (under development), and MIPS (under development). GNU Pascal runs basically on any system that supported by GCC, and for which the build process was verified.
- Bootstrapping:
- FPC requires a suitable set of binutils (AS, AR, LD) on some platforms, GNU make and a command line bootstrap compiler. New architectures/OSes are cross-compiled. GPC bootstraps via a suitable version of GCC, and requires a full set of binutils, flex, bison, gmake, a POSIX shell and libtool
- Sources:
- Free Pascal is entirely written in Pascal, while GNU Pascal is written in C (it's an adaptation of the GNU C compiler)
- Language:
- Free Pascal supports the Borland Pascal dialect, implements the Delphi Object Pascal language, Objective-Pascal and has some support for ISO 7185 Pascal and Mac Pascal extensions. GNU Pascal supports ISO 7185, ISO 10206 and (most of) Borland Pascal 7.0
- Extensions:
- Free Pascal implements method, function and operator overloading (later Delphi versions have also added these, so strictly they are not extensions anymore) GNU Pascal implements operator overloading.
- License:
- Both compilers come under the GNU GPL.
- Author:
- Free Pascal was started by Florian Klämpfl, Germany (florian@freepascal.org), GNU Pascal was started by Jukka Virtanen, Finland (jtv@hut.fi).
-
License and copyright information
Applications created by the compiler and using the runtime library (RTL) come under a modified Library GNU Public License (LGPL). This license does not impose any kind of license on the created applications. It is therefore possible to create closed source or proprietary software using the Free Pascal Compiler.
The following exception has been added to the LGPL variant that applies to the FPC RTL:
As a special exception, the copyright holders of this library give you permission to link this library with independent modules to produce an executable, regardless of the license terms of these independent modules, and to copy and distribute the resulting executable under terms of your choice, provided that you also meet, for each linked independent module, the terms and conditions of the license of that module. An independent module is a module which is not derived from or based on this library. If you modify this library, you may extend this exception to your version of the library, but you not obligated to do so. If you do not wish to do so, delete this exception statement from your version.
Please note that you still have to comply to the LGPL as far as sources of the runtime library itself are concerned. This, for example, requires you to provide the source code of the runtime library if a recipient of your application asks for it. If you want to write proprietary closed source software, please comply with the following terms:
- Most people can satisfy the source code requirement by mentioning that the RTL source code can be downloaded at the Free Pascal web site: if you did not modify the rtl this is considered adequate to satisfy the LGPL requirement of providing source code.
- If you made modifications to the runtime library, you cannot keep them for yourself, you must make them available if requested by recipients of your application.
- Distribute the modified LGPL license with your product, indicating to which parts of your application it applies (the FPC RTL).
The compiler source code, on the other hand, comes under the GNU General Public License, which means that the compiler source can only be used in software projects that are distributed under a compatible license (or that are not distributed at all).
-
Getting the compiler
The latest official stable Free Pascal release is available for download from all official mirrors
-
Free Pascal installation hints
- Do not install the compiler in a directory that has spaces in its name, since some of the compiler tools do not like these
-
Why do i have to supply a user name and password to get Free Pascal ?
You are trying to login to an ftp site. You have to use the login name "anonymous" and your e-mail address as your password.
-
Access denied error when connecting to the Free Pascal FTP site
The Free Pascal main ftp site can only accept a maximum number of simultaneous connections. If this error occurs, it is because this limit has been reached. The solution is either to wait and retry later, or better still use one of the Free Pascal mirror sites.
-
I want a new version NOW
In the time between the release of new official versions, you can have a look at and test developer versions (so-called "snapshots"). Be warned though: this is work in progress, so in addition to old bugs fixed and new features added, this may also contain new bugs.
Snapshots are generated automatically each night from the current source at that moment. Sometimes this may fail due to bigger changes not yet fully implemented. If your version does not work, try again one or two days later.
The latest snapshot can always be downloaded from the development web page.
-
Installing a snapshot
To install a snapshot, extract the zip archive into the existing program directory of the last official version of Free Pascal (after making a backup of the original, of course). You can also extract it into an empty directory and then move the files to the program directory, overwriting existing files.
-
I have to write a program for homework. Can you help?
No. Please, don't send us mail about homework, we are no teachers. The Free Pascal development team tries to give good support for the Free Pascal compiler and are trying to always reply to emails. If we get emails like this, this becomes harder and harder.
-
How do I make a real Windows application with windows and menu bars?
The easiest way is to download Lazarus. It won't be just a Windows application, it will also work under Linux, FreeBSD and Mac OS X. -
How do I make a game with Free Pascal? Can I make a game like Doom 3?
Yes, you can make games with Free Pascal and if you are really good you can make a game like Doom 3. Making games is difficult, you need to be an experienced programmer to make them. The web site www.pascalgamedevelopment.com is a community of people who program games in Free Pascal and Delphi.If you want a start, please start to study JEDI-SDL or PTCPas. Also you can try to study an existing game, for example The Sheep Killer is a very simple game and it should not be very hard to understand its code.
-
Getting more information when an application crashes
- The easiest possibility is to recompile your program with -gl debugging option. This way unit LineInfo is automatically linked in, and the printout after a program crash then contains source line numbers in addition to addresses of the crash. To see runtime library (RTL) functions in the backtrace with their real name, you have to recompile the RTL with -gl too.
- For more comprehensive checking, compile the program with debugging information (use the -g command line option)
- Load the program in the debugger
gdb --directory=<src dirs> myprog.exe
Notes:- Under UNIX systems (Linux, the BSD's), don't add the ".exe" after myprog
- "src dirs" is a list of directories containing the source code files of myprog and the units it uses seperated by semi-colons (";") on Windows, or colons (":") on UNIX platforms. The current directory is automatically included.
- Once inside the debugger, you can (optionally) set the command line options that will be passed to your program using the command "set args <option1 option2 ...>"
- To start the program, type "run" and press enter
- After the program has crashed, the address of the instruction where the crash occurred will be shown. The debugger will try to display the source code line corresponding with this address. Note that this can be inside a procedure of the RTL, so the source may not always be available and most likely the RTL wasn't compiled with debugging information.
- If you then type "bt" (BackTrace), the addreses on the
call stack will be shown (the addresses of the procedures which were
called before the program got to the current address). You can see
which source code lines these present using the command
info line *<address>
For example:info line *0x05bd8
-
Compiler seems to skip files in directories that -Fu points to
This sometimes happens with installation/compilation scripts if the copying command doesn't preserve dates. The object files get older than the PPU file, and the compiler tries to recompile them. A simple touch will solve it.
Also note that FPC, contrary to Turbo Pascal keeps track of include files. Modified include files or duplicate names can trigger an attempt to recompile.
-
Why are the generated binaries so big?
There are several reasons and remedies for this:- You can create smartlinked applications. To turn on the generation of smartlinkable units, use the -CX command line option when compiling your units. To turn on the linking of previously generated smarlinkable units, use the -XX command line option when compiling a program.
- Normally, all symbol information is included in the resulting program (for easier debugging). You can remove this by using the -Xs command line option when compiling your program (it will not do anything when compiling units)
- Turn on optimisations, both for supplied packages (RTL, FV, FCL) and for your own code, this will also decrease the code size.
-
Runtime errors
When an application generated by FPC terminates in an abnormal way, it is very likely that a runtime error will be generated. These errors have the form :
Runtime error 201 at $00010F86 $00010F86 main, line 7 of testr.pas $0000206DThe 201 in this case indicates the runtime error number. The definition of the different runtime error numbers is described in the Free Pascal user's manual, Appendix D. The hexadecimal numbers represent the addresses on the call stack when the error occured.
-
Standard units
To see the list of base units supplied with Free Pascal, and on which platform they are supported, consult the Free Pascal user's manual. There is also a short description of what each unit does in the same section of the manual.
-
Debugging smartlinked code does not fully work
Debugging smart linked code might not work correctly. This is due to the fact that no type information is emitted for smartlinked code. If this would not be done, the files would become enormous.
While debugging, it is not recommended to use the smartlinking option.
-
Cannot compile a program using a binary-only version of a unit
Sometimes, even though there is a binary version of a module (unit file and object file) available, the compiler claims it cannot find the unit This can be caused either by an incompatibility in the PPU file format (which can change across compiler versions), or by a change in one of the units of the RTL that has changed in between releases.
To get more information, compile the code using the -vtu (show tried and used unit information) compiler switch, and the unit loading phase will be displayed. You might discover that the unit being loaded requires to be recompiled because one of the unit it uses has changed.
If you plan on distributing a module without the source code, the binaries should be compiled and made available for all versions of the compiler you wish to support, otherwise compilation errors are bound to occur.
-
Will you support ISO Extended Pascal?
FPC's primary goal is to be a Turbo Pascal and Delphi-compatible compiler, and it also supports a subset of the Mac-Pascal dialect and of Standard ISO Pascal. While in theory it would be possible to add a complete ISO Standard or Extended Pascal modes, until now no people interested in such functionality have stepped up to work on such features.GNU-Pascal is however a modern compiler that can compile ISO Extended Pascal. If you have any need for the ISO Extended Pascal dialect, we recommend you to take a look at this compiler.
-
What about .NET?
Occasionally, users ask about a FPC that supports .NET, or our plans in that direction.Mainly the users are either interested because of .NET's portability aspects (Mono is quoted over and over again), or because it is supposed to be the next big thing in Windows programming, and they think Windows programming will not be possible in the future.
While the FPC core developpers are somewhat interested out of academic curiousity (mainly because it could be a pilot for a generalized backend creating bytecode) there are however several problems with .NET in combination with FPC:
- Pascal is a language that uses pointers, and existing codebases can only be unmanaged. Unmanaged code is not portable under .NET, so that already kills most possible benefits. This also means that existing FPC and Delphi code won't run on .NET. There are more such little language problems.
- FPC's libraries are not based on .NET classes and data models (and cannot be changed to do so without effectively rewriting them), moreover the libraries could only be unmanaged too, or they would be incompatible
- There is nothing practical known yet about how portable an average .NET program will be. Little experiments with hello world level code mean nothing, that kind of code works with nearly any language. A good test would be to see existing non trivial codebases run unmodified under mono, that were not designed with mono in mind. Just like we try to do for Delphi
- The fact that on Windows 80% of the .NET code seems to be ASP.NET does not help either. This makes porting existing code less useful (since ASP.NET is tied to IIS), and new codebases of portable code can be set in nearly every language
- Operating System dependant code would not work anymore, since the Win32/64 interface is unmanaged.
So effectively this means that for FPC to benefit from .NET you would have to significantly adapt the language (thus compiler) and libraries, and be incompatible with the existing native sourcecode. Moreover that also means that existing apps would have to be rewritten for .NET, since it would take more than a simple recompile with a FPC/.NET compiler.
While unmanaged code has some uses (easier integration with managed code inside Windows), this still requires writing a code generator and defining interfaces and libraries. This means a lot of work and since .NET take-up is not really high, this might not be worth it.
However if a FPC user does the bulk of the work (e.g. a bytecode codegenerator, and maybe some base libraries) and if the work is suitable for inclusion in FPC (a very big if), we will of course include it.
Since support for generating JVM bytecode has been added to the compiler, such a project may be more realistic now than it has been in the past. Many of the caveats mentioned above still hold though: language compatibility is not 100% and most standard units will have to be reimplemented.
Pascal language related information
-
Considerations in porting to other processors
Because the compiler supports multiple processor architectures, it is important to take a few precautions so that your code will execute correctly on all processors.
- Limit your use of asm statements unless it is time critical code
- Try not to rely on the endianness of the specific machines when performing operations depending on data layout. In particular, reading and writing binary data
to/from files will probably require byte swaps across different endianness
machines (swapendian is your friend in this case). Freepascal defines
FPC_LITTLE_ENDIANorFPC_BIG_ENDIANto indicate the target endianness. - Try limiting your local variables in subroutines to 32K, as this is the limit of some processors. Use dynamic allocation instead.
- Try limiting the size of parameters passed to subroutines to 32K, as this is the limit of some processors. Use const or var parameters where appropriate.
- CPU16,CPU32 or CPU64 is defined indicating whether the target is a 16,32-bit or 64-bit cpu. This can help with incorporating 16,32-bit and 64-bit specific code.
- Use the ptruint type when declaring an ordinal that will store a pointer, since pointers can be either 32-bit or 64-bit depending on the processor and operating system. For 16-bit it is memory model dependent.
-
Considerations in porting code to other operating systems
Because the compiler supports several different operating systems, is important to take a few precautions so that your code will execute correctly on all systems.
- File sharing is implemented differently on different operating systems, so opening already opened files may fail on some operating systems (such as Windows). The only correct way to make sure to have the same file sharing behavior is to use the I/O routines provided by the sysutils unit.
- Clean up at the end of your program, i.e. close all files on exit, and release all allocated heap memory, as some operating systems do not like it when some things are left allocated or opened.
- Some operating systems limit the stack space that can be allocated, therefore it is important to limit subroutine nesting, and the number of local variables. Limiting total stack space usage at a given moment to at most 256 KBytes will make porting easier.
- Do not hardcode paths to files, try to use relative paths instead
- Use the following constants (defined in the system unit)
to get information on files, line endings, and to build paths:
- LineEnding : Indicates the characters which end a text line
- LFNSupport : Indicates if long filenames are supported (more than 8.3 characters)
- DirectorySeparator : The character or characters that separate path components
- DriveSeparator : The character that separates the drive specification from the rest of the path
- PathSeparator : The character that separates directories in the path lists (such as the search path)
- FileNameCaseSensitive : Boolean indicating if the filenames for this system may be case-sensitive or not
- AllFilesMask : String containing a wildcard expression for all files
-
Compiling Delphi code using Free Pascal
The compiler supports Delphi-style classes. Make sure you use the -S2 or -Sd command line switches (see the manuals for the meaning of these switches), or add {$mode objfpc} or {$mode delphi} to your source code. For a list of Delphi incompatibilities also check the manual.
-
Building a unit
It works like in Turbo Pascal. The first keyword in the file must be UNIT (not case sensitive). The compiler will generate two files: XXX.PPU and XXX.O. The PPU file contains the interface information for the compiler and the O-file the machine code (an object file, whose precise structure depends on the assembler you used). To use this unit in another unit or program, you must include its name in the USES clause of your program.
-
Compiling the system unit
To recompile the system unit, it is recommended to have GNU make installed. typing 'make' in the rtl source directory will then recompile all RTL units including the system unit. You may choose to descend into the directory of your OS (e.g. rtl/linux) and do a 'make' there.
It is possible to do all this manually, but you need more detailed knowledge of the RTL tree structure for that.
-
How does procedure overloading work?
Here is a procedure overloading example in FPC or ObjFPC mode:
procedure a(i : integer); begin end; procedure a(s : string); begin end; begin a('asdfdasf'); a(1234); end.You must be careful. If one of your overloaded functions is in the interface part of your unit, then all overloaded functions must be in the interface part. If you leave one out, the compiler will complain with a 'This overloaded function can't be local' message. Overloaded functions must differ in their parameters; it is not enough if only their return types are different.
-
Calling C functions
It is possible to call functions written in C and compiled by the GNU C compiler (GCC). E.g., for calling the C function strcmp, declare the following (the cint type is declared in the ctypes unit):
function strcmp(s1 : pchar;s2 : pchar) : cint;cdecl;external;
-
Integrated Assembler syntax
The default assembler syntax (AT&T style) is different from the one in Borland Pascal (Intel style). FPC however supports both styles. See the documentation for more info on how to use different assembler styles.
A description of the AT&T syntax can be found in the GNU Assembler documentation.
-
Unit system not found errors
System is Pascal's base unit and is implicitly used by all programs. This unit defines several standard procedures and structures, and must be found to be able to compile any Pascal program by FPC.
The location of the system and other unit files is passed on to the compiler by the -Fu switch. This switch can be specified on the command line, but is usually located in the fpc.cfg configuration file.
If the compiler cannot find this unit, there are three possible causes:
- The fpc.cfg file is not in the same directory as the compiler executable (msdos,go32v2, win32 and OS/2) or cannot be found as "/etc/fpc.cfg" or ".fpc.cfg" in your homedirectory (UNIX platforms).
- The fpc.cfg file does not contain the -Fu parameter, or a wrong one. See the build faq (PDF), especially the chapters about the fpc.cfg and the directory structure.
- The unit files ARE found, but are the wrong version or for a different platform. Correct fpc.cfg to point to the right versions or reinstall the right versions (this can e.g. happen if you try to use a snapshot compiler while the -Fu statement in the used fpc.cfg still points to the RTL that came with the official release compiler).
A handy trick can be executing "fpc programname -vtu". This will show where the compiler is currently looking for the unit files. You might want to pipe this through more (Dos, OS/2, Windows) or less (UNIX), since it can generate more than one screen information:
Dos, OS/2, Windows: fpc programname -vt |more
UNIX, Linux: fpc programname -vt |less
-
There is a new language extension that would be really useful. Will you include it?
Occasionally somebody asks for a new language extension on the maillist, and the discussions that follow have a recurring pattern. An extension is quite a big deal for the FPC team, and there are some criteria that are used to select if an extension is "worth" the trouble. The most important pre-selection criteria are:- Compatibility must not be compromised in any way. Existing codebases on at least the Pascal level must keep running. This is often more difficult than most people think.
- The extension must have real value. Anything that is only a shorter notation does not apply, unless it is out of compatibility with an existing Pascal/Delphi codebase. Practically it means it must make something possible that cannot be done otherwise or be a compatibility item
- The change must fit in with the scope of the project: implementing a Pascal compiler with support for RAD and a generic DB system. This excludes features like inline SQL, and large garbage collected object frameworks.
- an explanation of the feature
- why it is needed, what does it make possible?
- how you would implement it?
- many examples of typical use, and tests for possible problem cases
Besides these pre-selection rules and documentation, the other important question is who is going to do the work. Keep in mind that the FPC developers are volunteers with todo-lists that are booked till the next decade. You cannot expect they will drop everything from their hands and implement the feature because you need it urgently, or think it is nice. If you are not willing to implement it yourself, submit patches and maintain it in the future, chances are slim. Remarks as "this will attract a lot of users because..." are considered with a lot of scepsis, since that applies to any new development.
Runtime library related information
-
Why do I get wrong colours when using the graph unit?
If you use detect as graphdriver, you will end up with the highest supported bitdepth. Since the graph unit currently only supports up to 16 bits per pixel modes and since this bitdepth is supported by virtually all graphics cards, you will most likely get a 16 bit mode.
The main problem is that in 16 (and 15, 24, 32, ...) bit modes, the colors are not set anymore using an index in a palette (the palettized way is called "indexed color"). In these modes, the color number itself determines what color you get on screen and you can not change this color. The color is encoded as follows (for most graphics cards on PC's at least):
- 15 bit color: lower 5 bits are blue intensity, next come 5 bits of green and then 5 bits of red. The highest bit of the word is ignored.
- 16 bit color: lower 5 bits are blue intensity, next come *6* bits of green and then 5 bits of red.
This means that either you have to rewrite your program so it can work with this so-called "direct color" scheme, or that you have to use D8BIT as graphdriver and DetectMode as graphmode. This will ensure that you end up with a 256 (indexed) color mode. If there are no 256 color modes supported, then graphresult will contain the value GrNotDetected after you called InitGraph and you can retry with graphdriver D4BIT.
-
File sharing and file locks
The standard runtime library file I/O routines open files in the default sharing mode of the operating system (system, objects units). Because of this, you might get problems if the file is opened more than once either by another process or the same process.
Generally the behaviors for the different operating systems are as follows :
- UNIX systems : There is no verification at all.
- Windows : An access denied error will be reported.
- DOS / OS/2 : If the file is opened more than once by the same process, no errors will occur, otherwise an access denied error will be reported.
There are two ways to solve this problem:
- Use specific operating system calls (such as file locking on UNIX systems) to get the correct behavior.
- Use the sysutils unit or the Free Component Library TFileStream File I/O routines, which try to simulate, as much as possible, file sharing mechanisms.
-
File denied errors when opening files with reset
Trying to open files using
reseton non-text files might cause a Runtime Error 5 (Access denied).All files opened using the above system unit routine use the current
filemodevalue to determine how the file is opened. By default,filemodeis set to 2 (Read/Write access).So, a call to
reseton non-text files does not indicate that the file will be opened read-only. So, trying to open a file usingresetwith the defaults will fail on read-only files.filemodeshould be set to 0 (Real-only access) before callingresetto solve this problem. A sample solution is shown below.const { possible values for filemode } READ_ONLY = 0; WRITE_ONLY = 1; READ_WRITE = 2; var oldfilemode : byte; f: file; begin assign(f,'myfile.txt'); oldfilemode := filemode; { reset will open read-only } filemode := READ_ONLY; reset(f,1); { restore file mode value } filemode := oldfilemode; // ... close(f); end.For more information, consult the Free Pascal reference manual
Windows-related information
-
Releasing software generated by the windows compiler
There is no special requirements for releasing software for the Windows platform, it will work directly out of the box. The following are default for the Windows platform:
- Stack size is unlimited
- The stack checking option is not available on this platform.
-
Debugging
The GNU debugger v6.4 and later have been tested, and generally work as they should. Because the GNU debugger is C oriented, some pascal types might not be represented as they should. It is suggested to use the text mode IDE instead of GDB, which is available for windows targets.
-
Dynamic libraries
Creation and use of shared libraries (also called dynamic link libraries) is fully supported by the compiler. Refer to the Programmer's Reference Manual for more information on shared library creation and use.
-
Profiling
Profiling is supported using gprof. It requires mingw to be installed, and that fpc.cfg points to the correct library paths.
-
Graph and problems with keyboard, mouse and "dummy dos windows"
Problem:
- If you use the Graph unit under Win32, you cannot use the API mouse unit for mouse support or use the win32 Crt unit to get keyboard data. The reason for this is that the created window is a GUI window, and not a console one.
- Use units WinMouse and WinCrt instead.
Problem:
- When you follow the above advice, and you run your purely Graph based win32 program from the RUN menu in windows, a dummy dos window is opened.
- Set the application type to GUI:
{$apptype GUI}and put this line before your programs InitGraph statement:ShowWindow(GetActiveWindow,0);This will hide the dos window window.
Some of the demos (like fpctris) use these techniques
-
Cygwin binary directory in your path sometimes causes strange problems
The mingw make tool seems to look for a "sh.exe", which it finds when the cygwin binary directory is in the path. The way directories are searched changes, and the build process dies.
Solution: do not put cygwin in your global path for now, only add it when needed. Efforts are made to work around this.
Possible untested workaround: add mingw sh.exe to a directory before the cygwin binary directory in the path
-
Using the DOS compiler under Windows 95
There is a problem with the DOS (GO32V2) compiler and Windows 95 on computers with less than 16 Megabytes of RAM. First set in the properties of the DOS box the DPMI memory size to max value. Now try to start a demo program in the DOS box, e.g. HELLO (starting may take some time). If this works you will be able to get the compiler to work by recompiling it with a smaller heap size, perhaps 2 or 4 MB (option -Chxxxx).
-
Using DOS generated applications under windows
Several problems have been found running DOS software under certain versions of Windows (NT / 2000 / XP). These seem to be problems with the DOS emulation layers (emulated DPMI services or the Go32 extender). These problems may not occur with all software generated by FPC. Either applications should be tested on these systems before being released, or Windows versions should be generated instead.
-
The mouse cursor does not respond in the Windows IDE
In windowed mode, the IDE might not respond to mouse moves and clicks. Just change the properties of the console, and remove the quick edit mode option. This should solve the mouse response problems.
UNIX-related information
This section also applies to most UNIX variants, such as Linux, FreeBSD and Mac OS X.
-
Releasing software generated by the UNIX compilers
- There is no stack space usage limit.
- Stack checking is simulated.
- Minimal operating system versions :
- Linux : Kernel v2.4.x or later.
- FreeBSD : version 5.x or later. (4.x can be made to work with minor work)
- NetBSD : version 1.5 or later.
- Solaris : version 5.7 of SunOS or later (should work with earlier versions, but untested).
- Mac OS X : version 10.4 or later (Intel), or 10.3.9 or later (PowerPC)
-
Debugging
The GNU debugger v6.5 and later have been tested, and generally work as they should. Because the GNU debugger is C oriented, some pascal types might not be represented as they should.
-
Dynamic libraries
Creating dynamic libraries under UNIX-like operating systems is supported.
Importing code from shared libraries does work as expected though, since it does not require usage of position independant code.
-
Profiling
Profiling is supported using gprof under linux, FreeBSD and NetBSD, the latter two only since 1.0.8. On other other UNIX-like operating systems, profiling is currently not supported.
-
Libc is missing on platforms other than Linux/i386
Libc is a Kylix compatibility unit. Because it contains many i386 specific code and features structures from legacy kernels, it has not been made available on other platforms.
To access UNIX functionality, please use units like baseunix and unix.
-
Why can't the linker find "vga"?
This error typically looks like this:
Free Pascal Compiler version 3.0.x [xxxx/yy/zz] for i386 Copyright (c) 1993-2008 by Florian Klaempfl Target OS: Linux for i386 Compiling test.pp Assembling test Linking test /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lvga test.pp(6,4) Warning: Error while linking Closing script ppas.sh 5 Lines compiled, 0.2 secThis error is not an error in the installation of FPC or FPC itself, but a missing Svgalib library in your UNIX install. Please install the required library using your favourite package manager tool
-
Compiler indicates missing as and ld
Normally UNIX systems have the assembler (as) and linker (ld) pre-installed and already in the search path. That is the reason why these tools are not supplied with the compiler.
If the compiler cannot find these tools, either they are not in your search path, or they are not installed. You should either add the path where the tools are located to your search path, and / or you should install these tools.
-
An error occurred while linking, or "did you forget -T?"
There is a bug in GNU LD 2.19 and 2.19.1 that causes it to crash when processing FPC-generated linker scripts. This bug has been fixed in the mean time.
At the same time, LD has been modified to emit a warning of the form
/usr/bin/ld: warning: link.res contains output sections; did you forget -T?This warning is benign, and FPC intentionally does not pass -T to LD. The reason is that if -T is used, LD's internal linker script is ignored and only FPC's linker script is used. Such linker scripts also contain paths to libraries however, and if we would ignore the internal linker script then LD would no longer find libraries in distribution-specific directories.
OS/2-related information
-
Releasing software generated by the OS/2 compiler
The OS/2 compiler version 1.0.x and before is based on EMX, therefore it should work both on OS/2 and on vanilla DOS systems. In version 1.9.x and above this functionality is preserved in newly added target EMX, whereas binaries for target OS2 can only run under real OS/2. The following notes apply to OS2 target in 1.0.x and EMX in 1.9.x and above:
- All applications generated for the OS/2 (EMX) target require the EMX 0.9d (or later) runtime files to run. These files should be redistributed with your software. All the files which should be redistributed are included in emxrt.zip
- Under OS/2, LIBPATH should be modified to add the EMX DLL paths. Otherwise, programs will not run and will abort with an error 'Cannot find EMX.dll'.
- Stack can grow up to 256 Kbytes by default. This can be changed by the user or developper using the emxstack or emxbind utilities.
-
Debugging
The GNU debugger v4.16 (EMX port) has been tested (including its PM add-on, pmgdb.exe) and generally works as it should. Because the GNU debugger is C oriented, some pascal types might not be represented correctly.
-
Dynamic libraries
Even though this operating system permits the creation and usage of shared libraries (also called dynamic link libraries), the compiler currently only permits importing routines from dynamic libraries (creation of dynamic libraries is unsupported).
-
Profiling
Profiling is currently not supported for this platform.
-
Using DOS generated applications under OS/2
It has been reported that some DOS (GO32V2) applications (including the DOS compiler itself) generated by the compiler fail on some OS/2 installations. This is due to problems in the OS/2 DPMI server.
You should use native OS/2 applications under OS/2 (including the native OS/2 compiler) or try installing a new OS/2 fixpack to see if it solves the problem.
INSTALL.EXE complains about a missing TZ variable under OS/2
You are most probably using an older version of OS/2 (like OS/2 Warp 3.0) and do not have TZ variable in your environment. The easiest solution is to add "SET TZ=..." (e.g. "SET TZ=CET-1CEST,3,-1,0,7200,10,-1,0,10800,3600" for most of western and central Europe) line to your CONFIG.SYS, and restart OS/2. The proper setting for you can be found e.g. using the TZCALC tool from TIME868 package.
OS/2 compiler not working after upgrading to 1.9.6 or newer
An updated version of GNU assembler (as.exe) is packaged with release 1.9.6 (newer version was necessary to get support for features of modern CPUs). This version of the GNU tool was created with Innotek port of GNU C and relies on its libc. This results in higher limitations regarding supported configurations, because this libc needs recent version of OS/2 Unicode support libraries (LIBUNI.DLL and UCONV.DLL) not available in base OS/2 Warp 3.0 and OS/2 Warp 4.0. The updated versions were distributed by IBM in corrective packages (fixpaks) - see e.g. WarpUpdates site for information about OS/2 fixpaks and links for downloading them. This issue isn't valid for WarpServer for e-Business, MCP and eComStation - these already have the correct version.
Compilation under OS/2 fails with error "Can't call the assembler"
Apart from the point mentioned above, there is at least one more potential reason for issues with executing the assembler and resulting in error message "Can't call the assembler, error 2 switching to external assembling". This error may be result of the OS/2 system not being able to find DLLs required for the assembler. Make sure that you installed FPC completely (these DLLs are part of file asldos2.zip) and that you have set LIBPATH according to instructions in README.TXT (and restarted afterwards). If in doubts, running the assembler directly from the command line (e.g. "as --version" to show the installed as.exe version) may be helpful to see name of the missing dynamic library or other details about the problem.
BeOS-related information
-
Releasing software generated by the BeOS compiler
Software generated for the BeOS target will only work on the Intel based version of BeOS.
- The target system must have at least BeOS v4.0 or later (BeOS 5.1d 'Dano' is not supported)
- Stack size is set to 256 Kbytes. This cannot be changed
-
Debugging
Debugging works with the system-supplied gdb version.
-
Dynamic libraries
Even though this operating system permits the creation and usage of shared libraries (also called dynamic link libraries), the compiler currently only permits importing routines from dynamic libraries (creation of dynamic libraries is unsupported).
-
Profiling
Profiling is currently not supported for this platform.
-
BeOS Linking problems
It has been reported that certain versions of the linker that shipped with some versions of BeOS are broken. If you get an error when linking fpc applications, try updating your version of ld from the following site.
DOS-related information
-
Releasing software generated by the DOS compiler
- If your program uses floating point code (which is very probable), make sure to read "Applications created with Free Pascal crash on 80386 systems" regarding special issues which might occur. Math coprocessor emulation software is then required (wmemu387.dxe should be redistributed with your software)
- The target system must have a DPMI server. To avoid problems, the file cwsdpmi.exe should always be redistributed with your application
- The target system must have DOS 3.3 or later
- The default stack size is 256 Kbytes. See also "Changing the default stack size"
- The stack checking option is available on this platform.
-
Debugging
The GNU debugger v4.16 and later have been tested, and generally work as they should. Because the GNU debugger is C oriented, some pascal types might not be represented as they should. It is suggested to use the text mode IDE instead of GDB, which is available for the DOS target.
-
Dynamic Libraries
Creation or use of shared libraries (also called dynamic link libraries) is not supported under this platform.
-
Profiling
Profiling with gprof is supported for this platform.
-
Running Free Pascal without a math coprocessor?
On the Intel version the emulator is automatically loaded by the compiler if you add the following commands to your autoexec.bat:
SET 387=N SET EMU387=C:\PP\BIN\GO32V2\WEMU387.DXE(do not forget to replace the C:\PP with the directory where you installed FPC) -
Applications created with Free Pascal crash on 80386 systems
-
Trying to run an application which performs floating point operations on a 386 system without a math co-processor will crash unless the emu387 unit is used, as this unit loads the math co-processor emulator (called wmemu387.dxe). You can add the unit as follows:
program myprog; uses emu387, ...When the application is released, the software package should also include the wmemu387.dxe redistributable file to avoid problems. .
-
Some 80386 systems have a hardware bug which corrupt the accumulator register EAX if it is used in a MOV instruction just after a POPAL instruction. Prior to version 1.0.5, the compiler and runtime library could generate such code sequences. This is now fixed and should no longer cause problems
-
-
The mouse cursor is not visible in graphics screens
Many DOS mouse drivers do not properly support mouse cursors in VESA modes. Logitech is said to have a decent mouse driver, which can be found here
-
Accessing I/O ports
The Port array is supported like in TP, as long as you use the ports unit in your program (not available under Win32).
I/O port access is possible under Linux, but that requires root privileges. Check the manuals for the IOPerm, ReadPort and WritePort procedures. (Unit Linux)
-
Accessing DOS memory / Doing graphics programming
You can do like in Turbo Pascal, via absolute or mem[]. For larger memory blocks use the dosmemput/dosmemget routines in the Go32 unit.
-
Changing the default stack size
Under the DOS (GO32V2) target, the default stack size to 256 bKbytes. This can be modified with a special DJGPP utility called stubedit. It is to note that the stack may also be changed with some compiler switches, this stack size, if greater then the default stack size will be used instead, otherwise the default stack size is used.